Its very premature to publish such authoritative topics like these. But this information helped me to get rid of this very big confusion that I was having regarding what gear system to choose. Here, I have tabulated whatever information I have collected regarding them.
Particulars
|
Derailleur Gears
|
Hub Gears
|
Maintenance
|
High on effort t and cost(because of open system)
|
Less on effort and cost(closed system protects it from
dust, water and physical trauma)
|
Chain
|
More flexible, less durable
|
Wider stronger and enables effective force transmission
|
Chain Path
|
Higher and more flexions due to two pulley wheels giving
additive friction
|
Smaller chain path with no pulleys.
|
Grease tattoos on trousers(A big concern for work-commuters)
|
Frequent since the drivetrain is exposed
|
As the drivetrain is enclosed this issue is almost unheard
of.
|
Sturdiness
|
Fragile
|
Sturdy
|
Ease of use
|
Complex due to two shifters and issues of ratio overlap
and cross-chaining.
|
Only one shifter present making it very user friendly and
hassle free, a benefit for beginners and in high-traffic.
|
Shifting while pedaling
|
Not possible in most models
|
Possible (important for city rides and trails)
|
Coaster brakes
|
Usually absent
|
Present. Effective in rain and snow. Very less
maintenance. Complex and costly repairs. Inefficient heat dissipation. Not
suitable for long descents. Longer response time and chances of skidding.
|
Shifting force required
|
High
|
Low
|
Gear Ratio
|
High overall gear ratios
|
High ratio present only in top models like Rohloff
Speedhub
|
Weight
|
Very light
|
Heavy
|
Cost
|
Cheaper
|
Very expensive
|
System mechanics
|
Simple and can be easily repaired
|
Complex system; complex repairs
|
Efficiency
|
98%
|
92%
|
Rear wheel removal(think of a flat while touring)
|
Piece of cake
|
Difficult
|
Best suitable for
|
Go Fast riders (Performance, speed, sports)
|
Leisure Riders (Commuting, recreational rides)
|
No comments:
Post a Comment